St Isaac the Syrian and Apokatastasis

Fr Aidan Kimel

On 27 November 2014 I gave a talk titled “St Isaac the Syrian, Apokatastasis, and the Renewal of Orthodox Preaching” at the first Theotokos Institute Conference in Cardiff, Wales. An expanded, footnoted version of the talk will be published in the journal Logos: A Journal of Eastern Christian Studies in 2016. I am grateful to the Theotokos Institute for the invitation to deliver this address and for the helpful and encouraging responses from the conference participants. I have divided my talk into three sections: (1) St Isaac the Syrian and Apokatastasis, (2) the Proclamatory Rule of the Gospel, and (3) Preaching the Kingdom. Please do not reblog or reproduce these articles without permission.

* * *

How is the gospel of Jesus Christ rightly proclaimed? How do we tell the narrative of the Savior in such a way that the kingdom of God is made present? How do we preach the good news as good news? These are the questions to which I will be speaking in this morning’s address. Underlying my address is a simple premise: how we understand the conclusion of the gospel story will necessarily inform and shape how we tell the story.

St Isaac the Syrian is known and celebrated as above all a mystical theologian of divine love. He delights in speaking of the unconditional love of God. No doubt this is why his discourses have captured the hearts of so many Christian believers over the centuries. As Met Hilarion Alfeyev writes: “In Isaac’s understanding, God is above all immeasurable and boundless love. The conviction that God is love dominates Isaac’s thought: it is the source of his theological opinions, ascetical recommendations, and mystical insights” (The Spiritual World of Isaac the Syrian, pp. 35-36). The love of the Creator fills the heart of the great ascetic with wonder and awe, inciting him to rhapsodic praise:

What profundity of richness, what mind and exalted wisdom is God’s! What compassionate kindness and abundant goodness belongs to the Creator! … In love did He bring the world into existence; in love does He guide it during this its temporal existence; in love is He going to bring it to that wondrous transformed state, and in love will the world be swallowed up in the great mystery of Him who has performed all these things; in love will the whole course of the governance of creation be finally comprised. (II.38.1-2)

The world begins in love, is ordered, maintained, and sustained in love, and concludes in love.

The divine love is absolute, unconditional, unmerited, gratuitous, extravagant, prodigal. It intends every human and angelic being, the righteous and the wicked. Isaac is clear. No one is “to the front or to the back of God’s love.” God has a “single equal love” for saint and sinner alike (II.38.2).

Any suggestion that God might, in response to sin, alter his attitude toward rational beings compromises the divine immutability and destroys the Love that God is. God is not a creature. He does not live in time. He is not affected by the events of history, nor is he is subject to passions. “In the mind of the Creator,” Isaac explains, “there exists a single even intention with respect to all rational beings, and there exists with Him a single love and compassion which is spread out over all creation, (a love) which is without alteration, timeless and everlasting” (II.40.1). The divine love precedes God’s creation of the world and does not change in response to the actions of his creatures. It preveniently embraces the righteous and the unrighteous. “God has a single caring concern for those who have fallen, just as much as for those who have not fallen” (II.40.3). If the omnibenevolent Deity is so promiscuous and indiscriminate in his love, what then of his justice? St Isaac famously replies, “Do not call God just, for His justice is not manifest in the things concerning you” (I.51, p. 387). How can we call God just, when we see the owner of the vineyard giving the same wages to those who worked the entire day and to those who worked only one hour? How can we call God just when we see the father lavishing gifts upon his prodigal son who had thrown away his inheritance on women and wine? “Where, then, is God’s justice?” asks Isaac—”for while we are sinners Christ died for us!” (I.51, p. 387).

And this brings us to the Last Judgment and the “difficult matter of Gehenna” (II.39.1). Christians have long believed that Holy Scripture teaches us that God will reward the righteous with eternal bliss and punish the wicked with eternal torment. St Isaac, however, rejects the claim that God retributively punishes the wicked. In his eyes this is mere anthropomorphism, the reduction of the God and Father of the Lord Jesus to the condition of pagan deity. Thus he declares: “God is not one who requites evil, but he sets evil aright” (II.39.15). Love is incompatible with retaliation. It is only concerned with “what is most advantageous in the future: it examines what is to come, and not things that are past” (II.39.17). St Isaac reads the Bible through a hermeneutic of love. He acknowledges that it sometimes appears to attribute wrath and vengeance to the Almighty Creator; but all such references need to be interpreted figuratively, in accordance with the gospel of Christ.

In Gehenna the reprobate suffer because they have been given to see that they have rejected their supreme good and sinned against their truest friend. The Father never ceases to love the damned nor to will their good and salvation—and that is their damnation:

I say that even those who are tormented in Gehenna are tormented with the torments of love. Torments for love’s sake, that is, the torment of those who perceive that they have sinned against love, is harder and more bitter than the tortures of fear. The sufferings that take hold of the heart through the sinning against love are more acute than any other torture. It is absurd to think that the sinners in Gehenna are deprived of the love of the Creator. … I say that the hard tortures are grief for love. (I.28, trans. Patrik Hagman)

Unlike, say, St John of Damascus, who denies in the damned any remaining desire for God, Isaac sees them as still possessing a driblet of desire. Their sufferings are caused by their regret, their guilt, their “grief for love.”

And here the matter stood for over a thousand years. The majority of St Isaac’s discourses (the First Part) were translated into Greek and Latin in the late first millennium. On the basis of these translations, the Nineven has been interpreted as affirming damnation as a noetic state of definitive and irrevocable rejection of God; in other words, he has been assimilated to the free-will model of everlasting perdition. But all this changed in 1983 when Sebastian Brock discovered in the Bodlein Library a manuscript containing over forty Syriac discourses whose existence had been known but thought lost (the Second Part). Three of these homilies address the theme of the Last Things. In them St Isaac passionately espouses apokatastasis—universal reconciliation. He most certainly believes that at the Last Judgment God will condemn the impenitent and depraved to an existence of torment. He most certainly affirms the reality and horror of Gehenna. But—and oh, what a glorious “but”—it will ultimately prove to be purgative and temporary. The damned may be “scourged by the scourge of love,” but the scourging is not forever! In a hidden mystery of grace God will find a way to save all:

I am of the opinion that He is going to manifest some wonderful outcome, a matter of immense and ineffable compassion on the part of the glorious Creator, with respect to the ordering of this difficult matter of (Gehenna’s) torment: out of it the wealth of His love and power and wisdom will become known all the more—and so will the insistant might of the waves of his goodness. (II.39.6)

God does not punish to no purpose. He chastises only to purify and liberate. The eternal Creator did not create hell, but foreknowing humanity’s fall into sin, he has comprehended sin and Gehenna into his redemptive purposes. “The Kingdom and Gehenna,” St Isaac avers, “are matters belonging to mercy, which were conceived of in their essence by God as a result of His eternal goodness. … That we should say or think that the matter is not full of love and mingled with compassion would be an opinion full of blasphemy and insult to our Lord God” (II.39.22). Borrowing a phrase from Sergius Bulgakov, we may fittingly describe Isaac’s conception of Gehenna as “universal purgatory.” The sufferings of the damned are reparative, remedial, and therapeutic. God’s love and mercy will ultimately triumph in the hearts of even the most hardened sinners.

The Syriac mystic does not speculate on how God will effect the free conversion of the damned—this is a mystery that has not been revealed to us—but he is filled with an unconquerable and decisive hope. Despite hell, and even because of hell, the final destiny of humanity will be glorious; the grace and mercy of God will ultimately overcome all resistance; God will be all in all. It would be blasphemous to think otherwise.

(Go to “The Proclamatory Rule of the Gospel”)

© 2014 Alvin F. Kimel

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Eschatology, Isaac the Syrian, Preaching and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to St Isaac the Syrian and Apokatastasis

  1. jrj1701 says:

    Father Bless,
    As per your wish, I humbly ask permission to share this post on Google+, and in two communities on Google+, I will disable reshares to comply with your wishes of only sharing this with your permission.

    Like

    • Fr Aidan Kimel says:

      I certainly approve of anyone sharing the hyperlink to this article. My concern is the actual reproduction of the article, either in part or in toto.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. brian says:

    I look forward to reading the rest . . . this is very good and sound. The end of the story reveals the meaning of everything prior.

    Like

  3. bradjersak says:

    Father, bless,

    I would like to drive some of our Clarion Journal traffic (about 10,000 hits/month) to your site and esp. to this article. It would help if I could reblog the first two paragraphs with a link to you so they’d click to finish reading at your site. If this isn’t possible, no worries, but I thought I’d ask.

    In Christ,
    Brad / Irenaeus

    Like

  4. Interesting post Fr. Kimel. I have a question about the term “apocatastasis.” I was reading a theologian the other day who was dismissive of the term because – according to him – it encapsulates the idea that the new heaven and earth will merely be a re-duplication of the edenic state, rather than a truly “new” creation, thus negating the possibility of novel ascent toward deification in the wake of the apocalypse. In other words, indicating a circular history whose end is undifferentiated from its beginning rather than a repetition with difference. Do you believe that this is a fair evaluation? Would Isaac (and the other fathers) have understood apocatastasis in this way?

    Thanks,

    Caleb

    Like

    • Fr Aidan Kimel says:

      Caleb, doesn’t one have to take this on a case-by-case basis? If a particular theologian defines “apocatastasis” as a metaphysical return to the original state, then there are sound grounds upon which to criticize such an understanding. But might there not be other construals of “apocatastasis” that do not entail such a metaphysical return? And in fact there are!

      Like

Comments are closed.