Follow on Facebook
Recent Comments
Robert Fortuin on Once Loved Always Loved: Chapt… Counter-Rebel on Once Loved Always Loved: Chapt… ruthgoringbooks on Once Loved Always Loved: Chapt… Barry K on Book Review: Once Loved Always… cephyr13 on Transubstantiation: Where Does… Fr Aidan Kimel on Transubstantiation: Where Does… Barry K on Once Loved Always Loved: Chapt… Barry K on Transubstantiation: Where Does… cephyr13 on Transubstantiation: Where Does… Geoffrey on Once Loved Always Loved: Chapt… -
Recent Posts
Categories
- Ainulindale
- Alexander Earl
- Apostle Paul
- Aquinas
- Athanasius
- Augustine
- Basil of Caesarea
- Bible
- Book Reviews
- Brian Moore
- Citations
- Cyril of Alexandria
- Dante
- David B. Hart
- Dionysius the Areopagite
- Dumitru Staniloae
- Eric Reitan
- George MacDonald
- Grace, Justification & Theosis
- Gregory Nazianzen
- Gregory of Nyssa
- Henri de Lubac
- Herbert McCabe & Friends
- Holy Trinity
- Hugh McCann
- Humor
- Icons
- Inklings & Company
- Interesting Theologians
- Irenaeus
- Isaac the Syrian
- Islam
- John Behr
- John Stamps
- Jordan Wood
- Julian of Norwich
- Lamentation
- Liturgy & Sermons
- Mark Chenoweth
- Maximus the Confessor
- Mythopoeia
- Nicholas Wolfterstorff
- Patristic and Byzantine theology
- Paul Griffiths
- Personal
- Philosophical Theology
- Poetry & Fiction
- Preaching
- Robert Farrar Capon
- Robert Fortuin
- Robert Jenson
- Roberto De La Noval
- Sacraments
- Sergius Bulgakov
- Spirituality
- T. F. Torrance
- T. S. Eliot
- Theology
- Theotokos
- Thomas Allin
- Thomas Talbott
- Tom Belt
- Uncategorized
- Universalism and Eschatology
- Vincent of Lérins
- Zizioulas & Yannaras
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
Exalting Mary as “Mother of God”, is an error of Roman Catholic and other churches’ history. she called herself “the handmaiden of God” and “rejoiced in Christ, her Savior”. She should be rightly titled what she herself proclaimed, “Christ bearer”. There is only “one mediator between God and man–the “God Incarnate” and our “High Priest”–Jesus Christ. Mary is not somehow a part of the “Godhead”!
LikeLike
David, no informed Catholic or Orthodox Christian believes that Mary is “part of the ‘Godhead.'” If you’d like to know more about what Catholics and Orthodox believe about her, I’d be happy to direct you to appropriate resources.
The discussion begins, must begin, with who one believes Jesus to be. If he is truly the eternal Son incarnate, as confessed by the Councils of Ephesus and Constantinople, then Mary is his mother. It’s as simple as that. She doesn’t have to be a member of the Trinity to be his mother. All she needs to be is the human being in whom the eternal Son assumed human nature.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The Holy Spirit conceived Jesus in Mary’s womb, a supernatural birth in every way. It was something like Adam having no father or mother, sinless, immortal, incorruptible, imperishable–before the Fall, with the exception that, of course Jesus was The Word of God taking on human flesh by the power of the Holy Spirit–totally supernatural! There is, I believe, reason to believe that both the ovum and sperm were placed in Mary’s womb uniting the Word with flesh–totally supernatural. The Scriptures don’t rule this out. God can do anything, even making Adam out of clay, immortal. The eternal differance, of course, is that the Eternal Word was clothed with flesh.
LikeLike
David, your view presented here is simply not a fully biblical and orthodox view of Jesus Christ. What you suggest here is actually quite close to what the Docetists (an early heresy) claimed–that Christ was fully God only and Mary was only a channel through which the Word came into the world and that He had no sharing in her humanity. However, the Scriptures teach that the Messiah would be a (biological) descendant of King David. If Jesus did not have a share in Mary’s DNA, that would be manifestly false, since the witness of the Scriptures is clear that He had no human biological father. The NT witness is that Mary was the biological mother of Jesus, and so He took his humanity from her. In the early centuries, another heresy arose (Gnosticism) teaching that Jesus was a mere human (not divine) from birth and was deified only at His baptism by John in the Jordan when the Spirit descended on Him. (This would be very similar to considering Him an “ascended master” in the manner of Eastern religions like Hinduism or Buddhism–essentially making His humanity nothing but the material vessel to contain a god.) It was at this point the Church officially affirmed one of Mary’s titles as “Mother of God” to underscore the truth Jesus was also fully God from conception, so Mary’s womb contained God incarnate. In context of the historical issues in play at the time, this is what this title means. In no way did it ever mean, nor have Orthodox or Catholic Christians understood it to mean, that Mary was the mother of Christ’s Deity or a member of the Godhead!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Why then did Jesus say, “For I say unto you, among those that are *born of women* there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist, but he that is * least in the Kingdom of God is greater than he is”? * (Luke 7:28) Obviously, Jesus–the only begotten Son of God, who came down from heaven to become the Word Incarnate–is the greatest in the Kingdom of God next to the Father. Notice also that Jesus always called Mary as “woman”, fulfilling the promise to Eve that “the Seed of the woman” (not of Adam, but the virgin-born prophesied Emnity/Christ) would be crushed and in turn crush the evil beneath His feet (referring to Christ’s atonement and victory over death and hell) [Genesis 3:15] The birth of Jesus was totally supernatural, conceived of the Holy Spirit! Mary was chosen to be what she called herself–the handmaiden of God. I agree that Joseph and Mary raised Jesus in his childhood, but all of Christ, including his flesh, was and is Diety-God Incarnate. Is there anything too hard for God to do? Does He need a man or woman’s help. In the title of this essay, it is claimed “that the Creator was created”–this is false and ludicrous to me and millions of other Christians. (p.s.–I’m not claiming that Jesus was not human like all of us–but super-human–proven by his many miracles and His resurrection from the dead)!
LikeLike
David, a fruitful discussion of the Blessed Virgin Mary requires mutual agreement on the identity of Jesus Christ, as defined by the ecumenical councils. It’s unclear to me that such agreement exists at this point. You appear to be claiming that the eternal Son did not assume human nature from Mary. If that is what you are saying (correct me if it’s not), then from all orthodox points of view (whether Orthodox, Catholic, or classical Protestant), this claim is wrong. Hence our discussion must begin not with Mary but with the doctrine of the Incarnation as historically expounded by the Church. I refer you to the dogmatic decree of the Council of Chalcedon.
LikeLike
This homily by a “St. Nicholas” doesn’t seem to copy its content from the “Council of Chalcedon”. In his homily, Nicholas seems to state that Mary was a part of the Incarnation of Christ and she somehow mystically existed before the Creation. He uses such terms as, “Mary-The Mother Of God” throughout and seems to teach that it took Mary’s consent for the Holy Spirit to conceive “The Only Begotten-not made Jesus Christ” in her womb. Such teachings as this lead to the “perpetual virginity of Mary” or even that Mary was virgin-born, as I believe the Roman Catholic teaches, and calls it “the Holy Assumption”. All this is totally Un-Biblical. Nothing can convince me that Our Creator was ever created, if this is what you and your church teaches. Mary humbled herself and called herself only “the handmaiden of the Lord”, and she said, “I rejoice in God, my Savior” Mary didn’t state that she was the “Mother of God”. She, too, was saved by the child that she bore, along with all in Adam’s race that ultimately will be by Christ’s Atonement and Saving Grace.
LikeLike
David, I do not see any future in this conversation. Thanks for visiting.
LikeLike