Robert W. Jenson: Reminiscences and Memories

I have been thinking a lot about the great Lutheran theologian Robert W. Jenson since hearing the news of his death on Tuesday night. Over the past forty years Jens influenced and formed my theological thinking more than any other single figure, even more than Thomas F. Torrance. I have long considered myself as a Jensonian of sorts. Not in the sense of embracing the kind of metaphysical speculation that Jens loved—I’ve never had that kind of mind and sensibility (Jens would have said I was too Anglican)—but certainly in the way that I preached and catechized. Perhaps I am still a Jensonian, only now in an Orthodox key.

I discovered the books of Robert Jenson in the late 70s while I was in seminary—specifically, The Triune Identity. I do not know how I came across it. I’m sure it was not assigned to us by our theology instructor. But when I read it, I was hooked. Here was a way of under­standing the doctrine of the Trinity that made eminent sense to me. The purpose of the Trinity is to assert that the history of Jesus is God’s salvific history with us and therefore revelatory—indeed even constitutive—of God as he truly is in his eternal being. After Triune Identity I quickly consumed Lutheranism, Story and Promise, and Visible Words. I do not know how many times I have reread these books over the years. Jenson is a deep, creative, challenging thinker, with a unique aphoristic writing style. I found him, and still find him, simultaneously accessible and unfathomable. I know that the latter is largely due to the limitations of my very average intellect. From the beginning I knew that Jenson was a genius, in a different class from most theologians and scholars I have read. Few can match his erudition, depth, and insight.

At some point, either while I was in seminary or shortly thereafter, I began to write him with my questions. He always responded. Sadly, I have lost his letters. Sometime after I moved to Maryland in 1983, I made an appointment to see him at Gettysburg seminary. He was gracious but not particularly warm. I later came to realize that he felt uncomfortable in social situations. I know I felt intimidated. I had a bunch of questions for him, particularly on the unconditionality of the gospel. He patiently addressed them all and encouraged me to enter into the Master of Sacred Theology program at Gettysburg, which I subsequently did. Over the next few years I took two seminars with him. We met at his home. One seminar was devoted to Christology. I wrote a paper on the kenotic Christology of Charles Gore, which I read to the class. The second seminar was devoted to sacraments. I wrote a paper on the Eucharistic theology of Robert Isaac Wilberforce, which I also read to the class. That was the way Jens’s seminars worked. I also did a couple of independent study courses with him, but do not recall anything about them. In one of our private sessions, I mentioned to him that I could not makes heads or tails of Tom Torrance’s book Space, Time, and Incarnation. He smiled and said, “Neither can I.” That was a great relief. If Jens could not understand it, then maybe I wasn’t as dumb as I thought I was. Maybe.

Jenson taught me to always ask, what is the evangelical intent of a theological claim or teaching? What work is it doing? We need not be woodenly tied to the historical formulation of a given doctrine, as long as we apprehend the fundamental truth it is seeking to express, no matter how inadequately and partially. To do theology is to participate in the catholic tradition of conversation and debate. It is never sufficient to simply repeat dogmatic formulae. The gospel must always be proclaimed in the present.

After I had completed the course work for the S.T.M., he and I began to talk about my thesis. My memory here is pretty shaky. I think it was going to be on the doctrine of the Trinity or perhaps on the doctrine of justification by faith. Probably the former, given that I was developing a strong interest in feminist misconstruals of the doctrine. During this time he came to my parish, St Mark’s Church, and delivered an engaging Lenten address. I do not recall the topic. I remember a parishioner asking him why some congregations were spiritually lively and others were not. With a twinkle in his eye, he replied, “Double predestination.” I silently chuckled. But in 1988 Jens and his delightful wife Blanche moved to St Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota. I was quite disappointed and abandoned the S.T.M. thesis. What was the point? I was only in the program in order to sit at the feet of one of the finest theologians in America. I was a parish priest and, despite occasional dreams of pursuing a Ph.D., I knew I would always be a parish priest.

I kept in touch with Jens after his move to St. Olaf’s. I wrote a couple of papers for scholarly publication. He graciously critiqued the drafts, and they in fact did eventually get published. In 1991 I and five other Episcopal priests authored a document that would eventually become known as the Baltimore Declaration. I do not recall if I asked him to comment on the early drafts, but he did sign the document after its release and arranged for its publication in his journal Pro Ecclesia. A year later he delivered a lecture, along with Stanley Hauerwas and Fr (now Archbishop) Joseph DiNoia, at a conference Fr William McKeachie and I organized in Baltimore. His lecture was entitled “The God of the Gospel.” Around this time I also edited a collection of essays on feminist language for divinity, Speaking the Christian God, and Jens agreed to write an essay (a provocative essay!) for the book: “The Father, He …”

Jens and his friend Carl Braaten started the Center for Evangelical and Catholic Theology, and they began to host annual conferences at St Olaf’s. I attended one or two of them. I particularly recall the 1994 conference, “Reclaiming the Bible for the Church.” I arrived a day early and was able to sit in on a round-table discussion with Brevard Childs. Needless to say, I didn’t say a word. I remember being surprised by how much agreement existed around the table on the canonical authority of the Septuagint. By this time Jens was moving beyond, though not abandoning, his commitment to the historical-critical method. His appreciation for the ecclesial reading of Scripture was deepening. At least that is my recollection.

In 1995 I moved to Charleston, South Carolina and became the rector of the Church of the Holy Communion. In 2001 a conference was held in Charleston, and Jens was invited to be one of the speakers. I immediately contacted him and asked him to preach at Holy Communion that Sunday. He agreed. His sermon was substantive, evangelical, powerful. Jenson took the preaching of the gospel very seriously. His theology flowed from his preaching of the Word. Later Christine and I took him and Blanche to lunch at Magnolia’s, my favorite restaurant in Charleston. That was the last time I would see him in person.

Jens and I continued to occasionally communicate after that, principally through email. In 2001 I sent him a draft of an essay I had been working on: “Eating Christ: Recovering the Language of Real Identification.” He liked it very much and accepted it for publication in Pro Ecclesia. I was thrilled and honored. In 2005 I called him on the phone. I was wrestling with whether to leave the Episcopal Church and was keen to talk to him about the contemporary Roman Catholic understanding of justifi­cation. He had been involved for many years in the Lutheran/Catholic dialogue. Jens had long held that the Reformation teaching on justification by faith was best understood as a meta-linguistic rule: always preach the gospel as unconditional good news. If this is what justification by faith really means, I asked him, do you see the Catholic position as excluding or denying the meta-linguistic rule? “No,” he replied. “If that was the only issue at hand, I would have no problem becoming Catholic.” (I subsequently received a similar response from George Lindbeck.) I suspected that would be his answer, but I needed to hear it nonetheless.

A year ago I was informed that Jens was suffering from Parkinson’s. I decided to write him and tell him how important he had been in my life and ministry. I also sent him a copy of a talk I had given in Wales on the gospel and apokatastasis. He replied: “That essay must have blown their minds.” And then he concluded his brief email with these words: “And if my stuff has been so important in your life, that is a great responsibility. We both must pray about that. Love, Jens.” That was my last communication from my doktorvator.

Robert W. Jenson taught me so very much. Most of all he taught me that there is nothing more important than to preach the gospel of Jesus Christ in its evangelical radicality. I thank God for the privilege of being one of his many students. I thank God for his friendship and support. My debt to Jens is immense.

The Church catholic has lost a great theologian, preacher, and man of faith. Memory eternal!

This entry was posted in Robert Jenson. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Robert W. Jenson: Reminiscences and Memories

  1. Several years ago Dr Jenson and I were both invited to speak at a Lutheran/Catholic conference in North Carolina, and during dinner with a small group the night before the main event, he and I jousted over the ordination of women. I thought I had the better theological argument but in the face of his intellect I have never felt more inadequate as a contestant. But neither have I ever had a better or more enjoyable theological disputation. It was a rollicking good time, and he was a master of the Great Tradition. Requiescat in pace.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Steven says:

    I was introduced to Dr. Jenson through your blog, and have very much been edified by a couple of his books.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. danaames says:

    He sounds like a very good and humble man. Memory eternal.


    Liked by 1 person

  4. Dwight Penas says:

    Al, you and i have long shared (albeit mostly tacitly) the joy, the inspiration (and maybe only in my case, the terror) of studying with Jens. (I don’t know anyone who ever called him “Robert”.) When “Eating Christ” came out, i told my theologically inclined friends “This guy must have studied with Jenson, and i continue to refer to it and to give copies to friends. You pay homage here to our mutual mentor and friend in a heartwarming encomium. I will be sure that Blanche Jenson sees this,
    Thank you for writing this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Fr Aidan Kimel says:

      Thank you, Dwight. And please pass on to Blanche my heart-felt condolences.

      P.S. Do you think his parents called him Robert or maybe Bobby? 🙂 I wonder when the nickname Jens took hold.


  5. DB Hart says:

    Without question, Jens and Blanche have always counted for me as being among the most delightful and joyous Christian souls I have known in the theological world. Theirs also always seemed to me to be about as enviable a marriage as one could imagine; I never think of one in isolation from the other.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. I am truly saddened to hear of the death of one of my excellent teachers at Gettysburg Seminary. Robert Jenson was absolutely unwilling to compromise with the truth of the Gospel. Justification by Grace was not just a pious teaching, he insisted; it is in fact the cornerstone of the Gospel, a dogma that must be proclaimed and celebrated. Indeed it is so! Thank you, Pastor Jenson! Now, I am an Orthodox priest (first ordained in 1999), serving in a mission I formed and still preaching this truth to all who will hear, a truth that I learned to understand and love from him. May his memory be eternal! May he inherit the Kingdom of Heaven!

    Liked by 1 person

  7. elijahmaria says:

    I am just writing to thank you for this brief window into time and eternity….M.


  8. James Harbaugh says:

    A singular influence in my understanding of the Triune God and his work. Prof Jenson brought a liveliness to Evangelical Catholic Lutheranism that continues on in exilic existence in the ELCA and ecumenically as well.


  9. William McKeachie says:

    May he Rest in Peace and Rise in Glory. Many thanks indeed for this splendid tribute. Tears, as well as a twinkle, come to my own eyes as I recall Jenson’s vivid presence (along with his wife) at the conferences in both Baltimore and Charleston. Wasn’t Alan Torrance at the latter? Alan and my own wife performed on violin and harp (to Jenson’s delight, I seem to recall). He was also one of the more spirited participants in our “Liturgical Hymn Sing”! And I recall, too, lively, somewhat sardonic conversation about T.F. Torrance’s mentorship of students, equally as magnetic as Jenson’s, for good or ill: “There are no disciples of Tom Torrance, there are only disciples of the Word,” was the insistent word of a Torrance disciple! Barth, Zizioulas, Jenson … and Simone Weil would be my own 20th century theological foursome!

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.