Twitter Tweets
My TweetsFollow on Facebook
Recent Comments
Elizabeth on Was St Maximus the Confessor a… Starflyer99 on “Very nearly the most di… Fr Aidan Kimel on Was St Maximus the Confessor a… Fr Aidan Kimel on Was St Maximus the Confessor a… Logan(mercifullayman… on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… DBH on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… DBH on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… Logan(mercifullayman… on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… Tom on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… Tom on A (New) Suspended Middle? On D… -
Recent Posts
Categories
- Alexander Earl
- Apostle Paul
- Aquinas
- Athanasius
- Basil of Caesarea
- Bible
- Book Reviews
- Brian Moore
- Byzantine theology
- Citations
- Cyril of Alexandria
- Dante
- David B. Hart
- Dionysius the Areopagite
- Dumitru Staniloae
- Eschatology
- Fiction & Poetry
- George MacDonald
- Grace, Justification & Theosis
- Gregory Nazianzen
- Gregory of Nyssa
- Herbert McCabe & Friends
- Holy Trinity
- Hugh McCann
- Humor
- Inklings & Company
- Interesting Theologians
- Irenaeus
- Isaac the Syrian
- Islam
- John Stamps
- Jordan Wood
- Julian of Norwich
- Lamentation
- Liturgy & Sermons
- Mark Chenoweth
- Mythopoeia
- Nicholas Wolfterstorff
- Paul Griffiths
- Personal
- Philosophical Theology
- Preaching
- Robert Farrar Capon
- Robert Fortuin
- Robert Jenson
- Sacraments
- Sergius Bulgakov
- Spirituality
- T. F. Torrance
- T. S. Eliot
- Theology
- Theotokos
- Thomas Allin
- Thomas Talbott
- Tom Belt
- Uncategorized
- Vincent of Lérins
- Zizioulas & Yannaras
Archives
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
Listening to this showed me even more about how I felt about the letters you kindly showed where C.S.Lewis wrote on his views on hell. And the realisation of how he twisted George Macdonald and used him in his book ‘The great divorce,’ to make even his ‘mentor’ bow down to his own beliefs in hell. And to force that view onto others, who would read the book. Some not even knowing George well. And then those reading that probably to think that everything George had said, he reneged on when he died. I found that the greatest betrayal it could be. To turn his back almost even. And to try to put words in Georges mouth he would never have said. I was so angry that he had done that. Because I KNOW George would NEVER have changed his mind about how he felt of a god who would cast people into hell. He knew who God truly was. Love. And listening to this that really comes across. Thankyou.
LikeLike
I think you’re being too harsh on Jack. I’m sure he thought he was bringing George into the theological mainstream and in his way commending him to the wider Christian public. And there is a difference between fiction and history, after all. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. I was pretty pissed at the time. I just find it hard the way he did it.
LikeLike
Dossn’t Lewis acknowledge in the book that McDonald’s beliefs were not what they are in the book? That seems fair enough to me. I guess this is eventually going to become a documentary, eh? Sounds pretty cool, maybe my friends and wife will watch it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dreamer-Lewis says to dreamed-MacDonald, “You talked as if all men would be saved. And St. Paul too.” And dreamed-MacDonald answers, “Ye can know nothing of the end of all things, or nothing expressible in those terms. It may be, as the Lord said to the Lady Julian, that all will be well, and all will be well, and all manner of thing will be well. But it’s ill talking of such things.” And, the “Preface” in which Lewis in the last paragraph begs “readers to remember that this is a fantasy”, includes in the second “if we accept Heaven we shall not be able to retain even the smallest and most intimate souvenirs of Hell.” This seems very close to a paraphrase of part of selection 112 in George MacDonald: An Anthology (1946) from the Unspoken Sermon, ‘The Last Farthing’, which he entitles “The Inexorable”: “There is no heaven with a little of hell in it – no plan to retain this of that of the devil in our hearts or our pockets” – though one could compare other selections he makes, too.
The Anthology, Lewis says in its “Preface”, is “to spread his [MacDonald’s] religious teaching” and would surely encourage people to want to read more for themselves, however difficult that may have been for anyone not living near one of the great British deposit libraries until the excellent reprints of his books of sermons from the late 1980s on (and later, the Internet!). Lewis begins the next paragraph,”I will attempt no historical or theological classification of MacDonald’s thought, partly because I have not the learning to do so, still more because I am no great friend to such pigeonholing. One very effective way of silencing the voice of conscience is to impound in an Ism the teacher through whom it speaks […] And in MacDonald it is always the voice of conscience that speaks.” That strikes me very much like a gloss on having dreamed-MacDonald say, “And wouldn’t Universalism do the same? You cannot know eternal reality by a definition […] it must be lived.”
LikeLike
Brenton Dickieson in his “80th Anniversary of C.S. Lewis’ The Screwtape Letters” (10 February 2022) links something I had forgotten – his transcription of a 1947 Time Magazine review of George Macdonald: an Anthology. It is interesting to see what warm prominence the Anthology (“Lewis’ full-dress tribute to his master”) was given – and therewith what a stimulus to reading more MacDonald.
LikeLiked by 2 people