Jerry Walls: Repenting of Hell

Western Christians have long believed that the fate of the individual soul is sealed at death. Roman Catholics point to 2nd millennium dogmatic statements that assert, or at least imply, the irreversibility of the particular judgment (see the Catholic Encyclopedia). The Catechism of the Catholic Church is clear:

1021 Death puts an end to human life as the time open to either accepting or rejecting the divine grace manifested in Christ. The New Testament speaks of judgment primarily in its aspect of the final encounter with Christ in his second coming, but also repeatedly affirms that each will be rewarded immediately after death in accordance with his works and faith. The parable of the poor man Lazarus and the words of Christ on the cross to the good thief, as well as other New Testament texts speak of a final destiny of the soul—a destiny which can be different for some and for others.

1022 Each man receives his eternal retribution in his immortal soul at the very moment of his death, in a particular judgment that refers his life to Christ: either entrance into the blessedness of heaven—through a purification or immediately,—or immediate and everlasting damnation.

Protestants appeal to various biblical verses that appear to support the eschatological finality of the particular judgment.  Hebrews 9:27-28 is a popular text: “And just as it is appointed for men to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.” Only until fairly recently have Protestant Christians begun to seriously entertain postmortem possibilities for redemption.

In contrast, Eastern Orthodoxy has been historically more restrained in its dogmatic pronouncements on the particular judgment, apparently willing to tolerate some measure of diversity. Like their Catholic and Protestant counterparts, though, most Orthodox theologians have believed that a change of personal will is impossible after death. On the Greek Orthodox of America website, for example, we find the following statement:

Now we face the question: What happens immediately after a person dies? Is there immediate judgment? Do we just sleep until the Second Coming of Jesus? What lies ahead for us the moment after we die? The Orthodox Church teaches that immediately after death a person is judged. He or she experiences a foretaste of the punishment or reward that will be received in its entirety at the Second Coming of Jesus. … Can there be anything like repentance after we die? The Orthodox Church teaches that the state of the soul at the Particular Judgment (immediately after death) is fixed and unchangeable, that is, there can be no moral improvement or repentance beyond the grave. The place for such improvement is in this life.

The wicked are eternally frozen in their hostility toward God; they have irrevocably exercised their fundamental option and are thus beyond even the help of their Creator (see “Is repentance possible after death?” and “Phantasmagoric Passion“). It might be argued that the liturgical prayers of the Church suggest otherwise, but that is a topic for another article.

As a Methodist believer, Jerry Walls does not consider himself bound to the dogmatic teaching of either the Roman Catholic or Orthodox Church. Scripture is the supreme authority, and he is not persuaded that it clearly excludes the possibility of postmortem repentance. If God truly wills the salvation of all, then there may be grounds for hope: “The same God whose mercy is such that he welcomes sincere repentance in the last moment of life is the God who would rejoice at the sincere repentance of a sinner after death” (Heaven, Hell, and Purgatory, p. 205). As we have seen, Walls vigorously maintains the possibility of eternal self-exclusion from the communion of the Holy Trinity, yet he is equally emphatic that God provides optimal salvific grace to every human being. He thus refuses to arbitrarily restrict God’s search for sinners to this life alone.  On what grounds, he asks, do we dogmatically declare that omnipotent Love cannot find a way into the hearts of at least some of the damned?

But to speak this way, the traditionalist objects, opens the door to universal salvation! “What would be so bad about that?” Walls replies. “And should not those who have been given much grace and opportunity be the first to wish the same for others?” (pp. 208-209). For Walls, the doctrine of eternal salvation is a contingent truth. He teaches it on the basis of the authority of Holy Scripture. But, he goes on to say, “I would be delighted if one of the things I have given the most energy defending in my career turned out to be false” (p. 209). How odd that so many Christians enthusiastically embrace the rhetoric of optimal grace and the boundless mercy of God yet draw back from their enthusiasm “when the logic of these claims leads to postmortem repentance” (p. 210). Like the Pharisees they are scandalized by the extravagant love of the Lord. I am reminded of a passage from That Man is You by Fr Louis Evely:

In one of his plays, Jean Anouilh describes the last judgment as he sees it.

The good are densely clustered at the gate of heaven, eager to march in, sure of their reserved seats, keyed up and bursting with impatience.

All at once, a rumor starts spreading:

“It seems He’s going to forgive those others, too!”

For a minute, everybody’s dumbfounded.

They look at one another in disbelief, gasping and sputtering,

“After all the trouble I went through!”

“If only I’d known this …”

“I just cannot get over it!”

Exasperated, they work themselves into a fury and start cursing God; and at that very instant they’re damned.

That was the final judgment, you see. They judged themselves, excommunicated themselves. (pp. 92-93)

C. S. Lewis famously wrote that “the doors of hell are locked on the inside.” Yet it is the crucified and risen Lord who holds the keys to those doors. Dr Walls concludes his reflections with these encouraging words: “The God whose mercy endures forever is a God we may never hope tires of putting his keys in the lock and bidding those within to leave it behind, naming it purgatory as they turn their faces toward the gate of heaven” (p. 211).

(Return to first article)

This entry was posted in Book Reviews, Eschatology and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Jerry Walls: Repenting of Hell

  1. infanttheology says:

    Father Kimel,

    I don’t think its constructive to talk about the word “Pharisee” and “believer in hell” in conjunction with each other. The issue for me is that Scripture seems to clearly teach about hell. If things are as Walls says, I would not object. But I think our preaching and teaching should be concerned to emphasize what Christ and His Apostles said and how they talked about these matters – and be focused on the prodigal love of God in this life. There is an urgency – not to be a frantic one – this way that I do not think would be there otherwise.


    Liked by 1 person

    • Fr Aidan Kimel says:

      Nathan, I understand your concern. My universalist convictions are often attributed to various personal concerns and pathologies. But the spiritual question raised by Walls, based on his experience with those who have rejected his suggestion of post-mortem repentance, is still relevant, don’t you think? Is the vehement rejection of such a possibility totally based on a concern for the truth, or is there something else at work? Surely Lutheranism, with its concern for hidden self-righteousness, can appreciate that, right?

      I should add that the reference to the Pharisees was my own addition. I added it as a way of introducing the Evely citation, which I thought appropriate.


      • infanttheology says:

        Father Kimel,

        Our self-righteousness goes deep to be sure. Probably mine more than most. That said, I think this really is about wanting to be faithful to Scripture overall. Many of my waking hours have been spent thinking about this, trying to begin to understand the reasons for hell or how it might be explained in ways that begin to seem slightly more palatable.

        The key passage then, remains for me: “my ways are not your ways….” I think I do get your own struggle with this, but well, again, you see my concerns in the first post.



        • Mike H says:

          I’ve seen Isaiah 55 used as an isolated clobber text for just about everything – double predestination, genocide, eternal conscious torment of babies, why tsunamis and earthquakes kill people, etc. It’s fascinating that it’s almost always used to justify something controversial or tough to stomach – that’s what “higher” is taken to mean.

          ““For My thoughts are not your thoughts, and your ways are not My ways.” This is the Lord’s declaration. “For as heaven is higher than earth, so My ways are higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.”
          But what are “God’s ways” in this context? What are “man’s ways”? And what would it mean for one set of ways to be “higher”?

          I’m not sure that “higher” is appropriately used in the context of the loving-kindness and justice of people (who can’t stomach hell and desperately want peace with their enemies) vs. the “higher” harsh, unforgiving endless retribution of God (who is very pro hell).

          The verse before says that “God will freely forgive”. Maybe that is “God’s way” vs “man’s way”:

          “Let the wicked one abandon his way and the sinful one his thoughts; let him return to the Lord, so He may have compassion on him, and to our God, for He will freely forgive.”
          And the two verses after say that whatever these “ways” are will be accomplished?

          “For just as rain and snow fall from heaven and do not return there without saturating the earth and making it germinate and sprout, and providing seed to sow and food to eat, so My word that comes from My mouth will not return to Me empty, but it will accomplish what I please and will prosper in what I send it to do.””
          So to me, it’s a matter of what “ways” we’re talking about.

          Also, I can really relate to your statement that “many of my waking hours are spent thinking about this.”


      • Harald Frebel says:

        Here in Germany we have a long tradition within the Protestant churches which confirm some of the above statements. Universalist ideas are found in the so called Pietistic movement, names as Oettinger (who even preached to the dead in churches), and Michael Hahn are well-known. They did a extensely preaching and writing work, but I´m not sure if this material is available in english. it would be interesting to compare those writings with your references.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Charles Twombly says:



  3. Robin PaRRY says:

    Thanks Father Aidan,

    I think that Jerry’s book is excellent. I highly recommend it, even though (as you’d expect) I do not agree with him that God cannot guanantee that all will finally be restored.



Comments are closed.